<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enda Kenny: Principles are conditional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.publicinquiry.eu/2009/11/16/enda-kenny-principles-are-conditional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.publicinquiry.eu/2009/11/16/enda-kenny-principles-are-conditional/</link>
	<description>Examining corruption in Ireland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:13:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.publicinquiry.eu/2009/11/16/enda-kenny-principles-are-conditional/comment-page-1/#comment-302096</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicinquiry.eu/?p=2393#comment-302096</guid>
		<description>In all honesty, the deal wasn&#039;t that spectacular when you consider some over 70s will damn their GPs on an almost weekly basis and most GPs are now looking for 50 euros per visit.  That said, the IMO are a community of practice as well as effectively a kind of trade union, and I can only assume that their members would expect that negotiators would get them the best possible payment.  Why should only TDs have principles?  Isn&#039;t the nub of the problem that principles are for some people but not others?  I wouldn&#039;t blame Reilly for the IMO deal - its pretty minor compared to the consultants obscene wage packets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all honesty, the deal wasn&#8217;t that spectacular when you consider some over 70s will damn their GPs on an almost weekly basis and most GPs are now looking for 50 euros per visit.  That said, the IMO are a community of practice as well as effectively a kind of trade union, and I can only assume that their members would expect that negotiators would get them the best possible payment.  Why should only TDs have principles?  Isn&#8217;t the nub of the problem that principles are for some people but not others?  I wouldn&#8217;t blame Reilly for the IMO deal &#8211; its pretty minor compared to the consultants obscene wage packets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.publicinquiry.eu/2009/11/16/enda-kenny-principles-are-conditional/comment-page-1/#comment-302051</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicinquiry.eu/?p=2393#comment-302051</guid>
		<description>You only had to listen to George Lee waffling the other day on the radio when asked what his proposal was. For a man who was never short of ideas, its amazing how quickly hes become part of the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You only had to listen to George Lee waffling the other day on the radio when asked what his proposal was. For a man who was never short of ideas, its amazing how quickly hes become part of the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.305 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-12 01:22:04 -->

