Mary O'Rourke's memoir: Self-serving and delusional

The following review of Mary O’Rourke’s memoir, Just Mary, appears on Amazon.

I really enjoyed this book, the story of Mary’s life and her political career! An honest politician with great ethical principles. So nice to read about someone like this!

Practically all the reviews are in the same vein. The following is my contribution on Amazon.

This book is little more than a self-serving, delusional attempt by O’Rourke to distance herself and her beloved Fianna Fail party from any blame for the economic catastrophe visited upon Ireland and its people.

Ireland’s economic downfall and international disgrace in 2008 was the end result of decades of political corruption principally led by Fianna Fail under the corrupt politician Charles Haughey and his incompetent successors.

O’Rourke was and remains a strong supporter and admirer of Haughey. It was Haughey who first appointed her to ministerial office and she remained a loyal supporter throughout his career and beyond.

O’Rourke’s admiration for the corrupt Haughey is reflected in her decision to dedicate a separate chapter describing a Christmas visit to his home.

This visit took place after Haughey’s corruption had been exposed and suggests that she has more respect and admiration for the traitor than she does for her country and its people.

O’Rourke blames everybody for the economic catastrophe visited upon the Irish people allowing only token, mealy mouthed, admissions that Fianna Fail may have been to any degree responsible.

She blames the global financial crisis, Fianna Fail’s coalition partners, The Progressive Democrats and, most disgracefully of all, the ordinary people of Ireland.

In her own words:

The biggest factor in our decline as a party was the blight of the global recession which hit us in 2008.

There is no escaping the fact that some aspects of their (Progressive Democrats) central philosophy and the concrete measures which this engendered – such as policies on taxation and financial regulation – undermined our effectiveness during a crucial time in government.

But most of all, this arrogant politician blames the people of Ireland (my emphasis).

Banks can be blamed for speculation but they were responding to demands from the people – It is the people who pressed for such financial facilities. Everyone wanted the bigger house, the next holiday the private school for their offspring and so it went on and on.

Throughout the book O’Rourke expresses very little real compassion or anger in response to the events following the collapse of the economy with one glaring exception – when she addresses how the media and ordinary Irish citizens have responded to Fianna Fail’s part in the catastrophe.

When writing about those who dare to criticise her beloved Fianna Fail party her anger is as uncompromising as it is revealing.

The paragraph is worth reproducing in full as it provides us with a clear insight into the delusional world in which O’Rourke operates.

I find it utterly outrageous that it is considered nefarious to be a member, even a grassroots member, of our party and as I write this today, this seems to be the common thread emerging in the media and in public discourse.

I rail against the fact that there are many writers and commentators who in my opinion could be accused of breaching the code of incitement to hatred, in the way in which they write and talk about Fianna Fail.

`Toxic’, `disreputable’, `underhand’: all these adjectives about us are heaped one upon another. I feel it is strongly reprehensible and grossly unfair to the ordinary men and women throughout the country who are the foot soldiers, unpaid, of the party of Fianna Fail.

How dare people cast aspersions upon them? It is as if over all those years, the pent-up hatred of the success of Fianna Fail has cut loose and commentators are giving vent to it, and in a way that completely lacks proportion or even-handedness.

It is nothing short of delusional to suggest that words like `toxic, `disreputable’ and `underhand’ could be used as a basis for accusing writers and commentators of breaching the code of incitement to hatred.

This is particularly so when much stronger words like `corrupt’, `criminal’ and traitorous are entirely appropriate when commentating on Fianna Fail’s political record.

It is nothing short of delusional on a grand scale to suggest, as O’Rourke does, that the negative reaction to Fianna Fail following the economic catastrophe has little to do with the activities of its members and leaders but is entirely down to jealously of Fianna Fail’s success as a political party.

But as delusional as she may be it cannot be denied that O’Rourke is immensely popular with the media and general public.

Her book is a best seller and has received an almost universally positive reaction.

On principle I could not bring myself to add to O’Rourke’s wealth by actually buying the book and so had to wait about two months to obtain it from my local library.

When I finally got my hands on it the librarian asked me to return it as soon as possible as there was a long waiting list.

It is disturbingly ironic that Irish citizens who probably cannot afford to buy the book principally because of the financial devastation caused by O’Rourke’s beloved Fianna Fail are queuing up to read all about her absolute loyalty to that very party.

Indeed, O’Rourke’s popularity within the media and throughout the general public can be seen as a measure of just how far Irish citizens have to go before they grasp the true meaning of democratic accountability.

Promoting O'Rourke's rag in the Senate

Mary O’Rourke’s memoir Just Mary was published on Friday 19 October 2012.

Seanad Eireann closes on a Friday and doesn’t reopen until the following Tuesday.

So it wasn’t until Tuesday 23 October that O’Rourke’s good friend Senator Leyden got the opportunity to cynically abuse this arm of government to promote her book.

The farce began with a comment from Senator D’Arcy. It is likely that Leyden arranged for D’Arcy to raise the matter so that he could then reply.

Leyden claims he had no intention of raising the matter. This, in my opinion, is probably a lie.

The cynical promotion of O’Rourke’s rag was raised around discussion on such matters as patronage of schools, food labeling and the war in Syria.

I’ve extracted the usual waffle on these matters leaving just the political bullshit surrounding O’Rourke’s book.

Senator D’Arcy: I read a review by Geraldine Kennedy of Mary O’Rourke’s new book and I see a full chapter of the book is devoted to Senator Terry Leyden. I am looking forward to that bedtime reading.

Senator Norris: In the interest of balance, could Senator D’Arcy advertise my book while he is at it? It is far better written. The Senator is not mentioned in it.

Senator Leyden: The Leas-Chathaoirleach should not be too severe with me. I have had bad experiences over the years. They are mentioned in the book.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach: The clock is ticking.

Senator Leyden: I thank Senator Jim D’Arcy for his kind words. Mrs. Mary O’Rourke’s autobiography is entitled Just Mary. In the book she mentioned the Seanad and the esteemed Clerk and Clerk Assistant, noting their professionalism, which is much recognised.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach: It is not appropriate for us to discuss Mary O’Rourke’s book.

Senator Leyden: It has been mentioned. The Leas-Chathaoirleach allowed Senator D’Arcy….The section in question is devoted to Charles J. Haughey. It refers to a Christmas visit to Abbeville.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach: If Senators wish to do so, they can read the book. It is not appropriate to discuss it now.

Senator Leyden: Is the Leas-Chathaoirleach recommending it?

An Leas-Chathaoirleach: The Senator has 20 seconds left. Has he any matter to raise besides these frivolities?

Senator Leyden: I had no intention of raising that matter at all.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach: The Senator has wasted one minute and 15 seconds.

Senator Leyden: The day is long.

The (political) day is indeed long.

And all those good Irish citizens who voted for the retention of this dysfunctional institution should hang their heads in shame for inflicting these political dinosaurs on the rest of us for many years to come.

Mary O’Rourke has more respect for the criminal Haughey than she has for the people of Ireland.

In her recent memoir Mary O’Rourke dedicated a chapter in honour of her long-time friend, the criminal politician Haughey.

I say ‘in honour’ because O’Rourke makes no analysis or comment on the criminal’s career/crimes. The chapter simply relates her cosy Christmas visit to the criminal’s home.

O’Rourke’s visit to Haughey after he had been exposed as a corrupt politician and her decision to dedicate a chapter to the criminal tells us that she has more respect and admiration for the traitor than she does for her country.

She is, in effect, saying to the people of Ireland:

I don’t care what damage Haughey’s criminality and corruption did to you, to your children, to your dreams and ambitions or to your country; I place my loyalty to him above all that is important to you.

Mary O'Rourkes's memoir: Dishonest and self-serving drivel

After months on my local library waiting list I finally got my hands on ‘Just Mary’ a memoir by former Fianna Fail politician Mary O’Rourke.

On principle, I would not buy the book. It would have made me physically sick to think I had contributed in any way to the wealth of this low grade, gombeen politician.

As I expected the book is nothing but a dishonest, self-serving attempt by O’Rourke to distance herself and her beloved Fianna Fail from any blame for the catastrophe visited upon Ireland and its people by her party.

On what went wrong for Fianna Fail and the country.

The biggest factor in our decline as a party was the blight of the global recession which hit us in 2008.

This is a dishonest claim: It was political corruption that destroyed the country and led to Fianna Fail’s downfall at the last election.

The Progressive Democrats:

O’Rourke claims that loose financial regulation was a key tenet of the PDs and became possible with the cooperation of Mary Harney’s friend Charlie McCreevy.

There is no escaping the fact that some aspects of their central philosophy and the concrete measures which this engendered – such as policies on taxation and financial regulation – undermined our effectiveness during a crucial time in government.

This is a dishonest and sly attempt to put the blame on others.

But most of all, this arrogant and dishonest politician blames the people of Ireland (My emphasis).

Banks can be blamed for speculation but they were responding to demands from the people – ‘It is the people who pressed for such financial facilities.’ Everyone wanted the bigger house, the next holiday the private school for their offspring and so it went on and on.

This is just a taste of the drivel that seeps from every page of this rag of a book.

More analysis later.