Data Protection Commissioner replies

Last week, I wrote to the Data Commissioner’s office to inquire why some of those found to have breached regulations were named in his annual report while others, like bankers and solicitors, enjoyed the protection of state secrecy.

The reply:

Dear Mr. Sheridan,

I refer to your email of 1 May 2012.

The relevant piece of legislation is Section 14 of the Data Protection Acts whereby the Commissioner “for the purposes of the law of defamation a report under subsection (1) shall be absolutely privileged ( this refers to the Annual Report).

This is the legal basis on which the Commissioner publishes his report and it is within this context that decisions are made as to whether to name individual entities.

Regards

This entry was posted in Regulatory Agencies. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Data Protection Commissioner replies

  1. Haymoon says:

    All are equal but some are more equal than others!

  2. wormhole says:

    i fear im losing my mind “for the purposes of the law of defamation a report under subsection (1) shall be absolutely privileged” er if they are in breach of regs
    naming them couldnt possibly be seen as defermation!
    Oh wait i forgot im living in Topsey-Turvey land,
    carry on

Comments are closed.