Gardai acting as government political force?

Protesters failed in their attempt to stage a peaceful, democratic protest during the visit of Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping because Irish police effectively abandoned their democratic obligation to allow and protect such protests.

Effectively abandoning their obligation as a civil police force for all citizens the Irish police apparently behaved as a political force acting in the interests of government.

The following is taken from RTEs This Week programme (6.30) covering an attempted protest in the Phoenix Part against the Chinese occupation of Tibet.

Protester: Can we have our property back please?

Guard: I cannot let you protest.

Protester: Why? What grounds are you taking this from us? Why?

Protester: He asked me, what is in your bag? I said there’s a couple of books and my Tibetan flag and I asked him, do you want to search and he said yes.I opened the bag and he saw the flag and said, what is this? I said this is a Tibetan flag and he said this is a public threat.

Woman protester: This is my own property.

Gurad: I’ll tell you what. It’s near 0945 now, right. This gentleman will be gone out of here at 1030.

Protester: We don’t care, we want our property back now.

Guard: We’ll give you your property back if you leave the Park, will you leave the park?

Protester: We will, we promise.

Guard: You follow us out the Castleknock gates and we’ll give you back your flags but you will not be allowed back into the park.

UDC lecturer and barrister specialising on the law of the European Convention of Human Rights said:

It would be dangerous to think that you could exclude demonstraters from those places just because they’re visible to foreign visitors.

A complaint has been submitted to the Garda Ombudsman on the matter but, as always in Ireland, people should not hold their breaths.

Senator Bacik: Principles in deep freeze

The concept of maintaining core principles in the transition from opposition to power is completely foreign to the vast majority of Irish politicians.

Here’s Labour Senator Ivana Bacik commenting on a number of issues on Newstalk yesterday.

On government advisors:

I wouldn’t have been a huge defender of advisors until I see first hand how important it is for ministers to have people who are politically alongside.

On breaching pay caps for government advisors:

I think it’s difficult, I think also that ministers would have people who are advisors who’ve got experience, who’ve got ability but, you know, I’m not defending…interrupted.

On Minister Quinn’s expenses claims:

I heard Minister Ruari Quinn on the radio during the week robustly defending it and saying that other’s are using the car, there’s officials using it.

So I must say having known Ruari Quinn for a long time I think he’s a politician of great integrity. I find it hard to believe there’s anything in this story. No, it’s nothing.

On reform of the expenses system:

It’s all being looked at, there’s a committee in Leinster House looking at that. There’s ongoing reform of the system generally.

At first sight this might sound like pure, unadulterated Fianna Fail speak but in reality it’s the voice of any Irish politician operating within the principles free zone of power.

This principles free zone has just one law:

When in power put all principles that may in any way damage the maintenance of that power into deep freeze.

Principles may be unfrozen and cynically used again only when safely in opposition.

Copy to:

Ivana Bacik

Alan Ahearne: Is he stupid or does he think we're stupid?

Former government advisor Alan Ahearne on media claims that NAMA is a secretive and unaccountable organisation.

I mean if you think about the banks who lent the money, and the banks still hold some loans to developers, they dont release information either about borrowers or loans.

They don’t release that detailed information. It would be breach of confidentiality laws if they did.

So I think trying to hold NAMA to a higher standard than the banks doesn’t seem particularly sensible.

It’s difficult to decide whether Ahearne actually believes his own bullshit or whether he thinks Irish citizens are stupid enough to swallow it.

Minister Quinn: Complaint submitted to SIPO

Following complaint submitted to The Standards in Public Office Commission (SIPO).

To Whom It May Concern:

I wish to formally lodge a complaint under Section 22 of the Ethics in Public Office Acts, 1995 and Section 4 of the Standards in Public Office Act 2001.

The complaint concerns the following allegations against the Minister for Education Mr. Ruairi Quinn.

First allegation: Reported in The Irish Mail on Sunday, February 19th 2012.

That Mr. Quinn claimed €1,400 for traveling 5,100kms during the month of July 2011 when his official diary shows less than 1,000kms was traveled on official trips.

Second allegation: Reported in The Irish Mail on Sunday, February 26th 2012.

That Mr. Quinn claimed almost €800 for traveling 2,800kms during the month of August 2011 when his official diary shows he worked for just nine days.

I also request investigation into the alleged claim by Minister Quinn that some of the expenses he received were not incurred by him but were incurred by officials using his car to shuttle to and from Leinster House.

Yours Sincerely

Anthony Sheridan

Paying back the billions

Letter in today’s Irish Times.

Paying back banks’ billions

Sir,

Ireland’s debt repayments for the now dead Anglo Irish Bank and Irish Nationwide Building Society (INBS) will reach over €47.9 billion if the repayments are not suspended. The bill could even rise to €85 billion when borrowing and interest charges are added in.

The debts run up by these two institutions are not primarily the responsibility of ordinary people living in Ireland – they are principally the responsibility of those who supported Anglo’s and INBS’ reckless lending.
Yet we have been saddled with repaying the debts through a system of “promissory notes”. The next payment, amounting to €3.1 billion, falls due on March 31st. Such payments are scheduled to continue until 2031.

This money could and should be used to maintain and expand public services and provide a desperately needed stimulus to the depressed economy. For example, €3.1 billion would cover the cost of running Ireland’s entire primary school system for a year.

It is clear that the Irish Government is viewed as a compliant debtor by the international lenders, especially by the European Central Bank (ECB). The Government must take action to fundamentally re-orient this unbalanced relationship.

We, 57 teachers and researchers from a wide range of Ireland’s third-level institutions, therefore call on the Government to immediately suspend these repayments so that Ireland is viewed as a challenging negotiator by the relevant parties, including the ECB, and to ensure that this unjust debt is written down.

Yours, etc,

IAIN ATACK (TCD); JOHN BAKER (UCD); TOM BOLAND (WIT); HARRY BROWNE (DIT); AUDREY BRYAN (St Patrick’s College); TOM CAMPBELL (DSC Kimmage); NICOLA CARR (QUB); MAURICE COAKLEY (Griffith College); BRÍD CONNOLLY (NUIM); COLIN COULTER (NUIM); LAURENCE COX (NUIM); TONY CUNNINGHAM (NUIM); LAURENCE DAVIS (UCC); DAVID DELANEY (WIT); DYMPNA DEVINE (UCD); Eilish Dillon (DSC Kimmage); VINCENT DURAC (UCD); ROLAND ERNE (UCD); MICHAEL FOLEY (DIT); MARK GARAVAN (GMIT); PAUL MICHAEL GARRET (NUIG); MARY GILMARTIN (NUIM); PAT HANNON (DIT); ANTHONY HAUGHEY (DIT); KIERAN KEOHANE (UCC); IAN KILROY (DIT); CARMEN KUHLING (UL); DAVID LANDY (TCD); CATHY LEENEY (UCD); SEÁN L’ESTRANGE (UCD); GERARD MCCANN (QUB) RORY MC DAID (Marino Institute); HUGH MCBRIDE (GMIT); TERENCE MCDONOUGH (NUIG); CHANDANA MATHUR (NUIM); ROSEMARY MEADE (UCC); GERARDINE MEANEY (UCD); FIONA MEEHAN (DSC Kimmage); MARIE MORAN (UCD); EITHNE MURPHY (NUIG); ENDA MURPHY (UCD); MARY P MURPHY (NUIM); TRÍONA Ní SHÍOCHÁIN (UL); CIAN O’CALLAGHAN (NUIM); TOM O’CONNOR (CIT); TOM O’CONNOR (DIT); KATHERINE O’DONNELL (UCD); AILEEN O’GORMAN (UCD); THERESA O’KEEFE (NUIM); HELENA SHEEHAN (DCU); PAUL STOKES (UCD); ANDY STOREY (UCD); FIONNGHUALA SWEENEY (UCD); GAVIN TITLEY (NUIM); BRIAN TRENCH (DCU); THERESA URBAINCZYK (UCD) JUDY WALSH (UCD),
C/o Arklow Street,
Dublin 7.

Eamon Gilmore: Profit more important than human rights?

Every country trading or hoping to trade with China has to achieve a balance between profit and defending human rights by highlighting China’s poor record in this area.

Most Western countries have made efforts to achieve this balance.

The French Prime Minister recently spoke out strongly during a visit to China.

US president Barak Obama also spoke directly to the Chinese and had an official make the following statement outside the Beijing courthouse where a human rights campaigner was being sentenced.

We call on the Government of China to release him immediately and to respect the rights of all China’s citizens to peacefully express their political views.

Many of these people are tortured and in one case the wife and children of a campaigner were starved for three days until he relented.

Amnesty International asked our Minister for Foreign Affairs, Eamon Gilmore, to specifically raise some of these cases with the Chinese Vice President on his recent visit.

Gilmore’s response:

No, we didn’t raise specific cases any more than we raised specific trade investments.

Trade investments, human torture? What’s the difference, what’s the big deal?

In fairness to Gilmore, he’s only reflecting the extremely low ethical/moral standards common throughout the Irish body politic.

Full report on RTEs Drivetime (20th Feb.).

Copy to:
Eamon Gilmore

Enday Kenny: Nothing free anymore (Except for politicians)

Enda Kenny was on the news the other day telling us that the €100 property tax was needed for street lighting, footpaths and libraries. He topped this dishonest argument by saying:

There’s nothing free in this world anymore.

This, of course, is not true either.

The annual top-up of almost €50,000 he received as leader of the Opposition was free and the €17,205 Jan O’Sullivan is pocketing on top of her minister’s salary of €130,042 is also free.

Rabbitte rabbiting on as the country goes down the tubes

Once again we see the greed and arrogance of politicians as they help themselves to even more money from the taxpayer’s pocket as the country goes down the tubes.

Minister for something or other, Pat Rabbitte, was not pleased when questioned about his Labour colleague Jan O’Sullivan pocketing an extra allowance of €17,205 per year on top of her minister’s salary of €130,042 (Morning Ireland, 2nd item).

In a barely tolerant voice at being asked such trivial questions Minister Rabbitte responded:

Well, sometimes our public debate has an unerring instinct for the peripheral. Jan O’Sullivan was promoted to Cabinet and has got the rate that goes with the job…

I mean if this is the level of discussion at a time when the country is virtually bankrupt as a result of the dysfunction of Fianna Fail I really find it very difficult to take it seriously.

When it was suggested that unwarranted expenses should be addressed the Minister became angry and did what all puffed up ministers do when they’re asked hard questions, he wandered off talking about something else.

Well are you suggesting that a tiny island nation that’s trying to trade with the rest of the world shouldn’t promote itself and promote the Taoiseach when he meets foreign leaders and tries to sell Ireland abroad?

I mean this has to be seen in perspective; government has to do its job to the best of its ability to sell this country…

It would be best if this kind of pernicious ad hominem, personal rumours by Sinn Fein were ignored and better that Fianna Fail be ignored given what they’ve done to the country.

Meanwhile, a very angry Pat Kenny, put the following question to Fine Gael TD, Mary Mitchell O’Connor regarding the government levy on personal pensions.

What is the moral basis for putting their hands in people’s pockets and stealing their money?

Pat, you know and I know that there’s no money in the country and we have to take extraordinary measures.

We’re depending on outside agencies, the IMF, EU and ECB to keep the country running.

Tell that to the so-called left wing socialists Rabbitte and O’Sullivan.

John Waters: Blind to the brutal reality of white-collar corruption in Ireland

Recently, Irish Times columnist, John Waters, did a really, really, stupid thing.

Writing in the Irish Mail on Sunday (January 22) Mr. Waters describes how he was browsing the Web when he was confronted with a pop-up competition, which, he writes ‘I was impelled to engage with’.

After clicking on a proffered answer to a quiz question Waters was invited to submit his mobile phone number which, and this is where the stupidity comes in, he did.

Immediately Waters was sucked into the murky, unregulated underworld of mobile phone rip-offs that ultimately cost him up to €200.

Now it might be argued that this could happen to anybody, indeed, it obviously happens to lots of people which is why most, if not all, phone companies are engaged in these sleazy practices.

But waters was doubly stupid because five years previously his daughter was the victim of a very similar rip-off.

She had texted her number to a TV advert which allowed criminals (Waters’ word) to steal over €150 from her account.

Waters eventually managed to get his daughters money refunded but only after a great deal of hassle and stress dealing with organisations like the offending phone company, Comreg, Regtel and the Department of Communications.

Here’s how he described the situation:

I discovered that this practice was widespread. So-called ‘premium-rater’ telephone companies were seemingly able to take money from someone’s mobile phone account with total impunity, even though no service had ever been requested and none supplied.

On top of this stupidity Waters goes on (unwittingly) to admit that he is extremely naïve and disturbingly ignorant (especially for a journalist) when it comes to his knowledge of how things are done in the (corrupt) state of Ireland.

Apparently Waters is one of those people who labour under the delusion that Irish regulators are there to serve the interests of the people, to make sure that citizens are protected against the ruthless activities of white-collar criminals.

On the off chance that Mr. Waters may at some point read this article I feel impelled to spell out the brutal reality.

So-called regulators, at best, consist of comfortable freeloaders, almost always appointed by politicians, who are expert only in drawing down their lottery sum salaries and expenses while regurgitating the same glossy annual report, which invariably paints a picture of absolute happiness across the land.

They exist for only one reason – to create the pretence that Ireland is a functional, well-regulated democracy.

These so-called regulators have just two priorities.

To do as their political masters instruct and to become expert in waffling to the general public about the great job they’re doing.

At worst, so-called regulators actively work to protect and indeed facilitate white- collar criminals no matter what the crime, no matter how much damage is inflicted on Ireland and its people.

How can I make such a statement with such confidence? Simple, I just look at the record, over, say the last thirty years, of endemic white-collar crime.

How many so-called regulators have independently uncovered white-collar crime in the last thirty years – None.

How many prosecutions have been taken by so-called regulators against white-collar criminals in the last thirty years – Very, very few.

How many white-collar criminals have been jailed in the last thirty years – Very, very few.

How many major white-collar criminals have been prosecuted and/or jailed over the last thirty years – None, absolutely none.

The most disturbing aspect of Mr. Waters’ article is his total ignorance of the depth of corruption in Ireland. The headline on his article reads:

Since when is larceny not just legal but admirable?

I can answer that question very precisely.

Larceny of the white-collar variety became legal and admired in December 1979 when John Waters’ hero, the criminal politician Haughey, came to power.

It was at that ignominious moment that Ireland and its people began the catastrophic slide into poverty and loss of sovereignty, a situation that will destroy the lives of Irish citizens for generations to come.

It is a genuine tragedy for Ireland that influential people like Mr. Waters are unable or are unwilling to accept the brutal reality that Ireland is an intrinsically corrupt state.

It is worth quoting the final few chapters of Mr. Waters’ article because it sums up his ignorance of the reality that our political system is corrupt and that the rotten system has spread the disease of corruption throughout all levels of Irish society.

It is as though many people now take it as read that Ireland has become a paradise for shysters and robbers.

I must have dropped off for a few years because I have no memory of this dramatic shift in Irish culture being discussed and ushered in.

Mr. Waters is admitting that he has no memory of the very serious political and financial white-collar crime that has been endemic over the last thirty years.

I still had these old-fashioned notions that stealing was illegal and even conceivably wrong and that the State had a responsibility to protect its citizens from crooks. Silly me.

Yes Mr. Waters, silly you.

Copy to:
John Waters

Minister Varadkar: Too much democracy is bad?

Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Leo Varadkar, does not approve of referendums.

Some quotes:

I don’t think referendums are very democratic.

I think an unnecessary referendum would be a huge distraction from what should be the real work of government.

We’re a parliamentary democracy, we elect a parliament and that parliament has the power to ratify treaties.

My difficulty with referenda is that they are often hijacked by political parties, either looking to promote themselves or by interest groups looking to make a protest or looking for certain concessions.

Here’s my interpretation of the above quotes:

Government knows best.

Too much democracy is messy and inconvenient.

All political power should be placed entirely in the hands of the very small number of people who actually make decisions within the Cabinet.

In functional democracies Minister Varadkar’s extreme views would be rejected out of hand.

In our corrupt political system, where politicians do pretty much as they like, his views are positively dangerous.