Farmers protest at loss of REPS 'income'

The REPS (Rural Environment Protection Scheme), scheme is designed to reward Farmers for carrying out their farming activities in an environmentally friendly manner and to bring about environmental improvement on existing farms (Department of Agriculture).

My understanding of this scheme is that farmers will be compensated/reimbursed for the extra costs in carrying out environmentally friendly projects on their farms. It’s not actually an income but a compensation to encourage environmental protection.

It seems, however, that farmers (and the Government) have been using it as an income. Here are some comments from a farmers protest last week in response to cuts in the scheme (RTE News, 4th report, 1st item).

By putting us out of the REP scheme we’re not going to get the money so the country is not going to receive the money.

It’s a bread and butter issue now, people don’t know where they’re going to get money to put food on the table and that’s the situation on the ground.

The school buses, the school books and the uniforms, they’re at their wits end. I’ve seen grown men crying where they have no income.

We’re not crying wolf this time I mean we’ve taken a 30% cut since last October. We don’t mind taking our fair share of the cuts; villages in rural Ireland will be decimated, this was putting money into local economies not just farmer’s pockets.

One thought on “Farmers protest at loss of REPS 'income'”

  1. I am a REPS planner in the west of Ireland REPS income plus single payment is the only income for many families. REPS average payment is 6,200 and single payment up to 10,000 euro. Agriculture is in crisis here animals are worth nothing – I’ve seen sheep sell for 5 euro each at the mart.

    REPS is important it keeps people farming – environment depends on farming e.g. corncrakes need haymeadows Chough need Cattle dung. Connemara is 60% designated as Special Area of Conservation there is little to provide income to people but farming fishing and tourism. There is little money in any of these. REPS has protected the environemnt mainly by keeping people farming who otherwise may be on social welfare.

    Activity is constrained by designations and so limits the activities that people can pursue to make a living. Many of my family friends and neighbours will see their incomes plummet to around the level of social welfare. Their land and animals are not able to provide an income for them. REPS going will simply mean more people drawing social welfare and more people living in poverty with negative environmental impacts too as land becomes invaded by rushes and gorse.

Comments are closed.