The truth about Terry Prone

I came across this letter to the Irish Examiner written in response to an article by Terry Prone. In my opinion the writer is spot on in her assessment of Ms Prone.

I write in response to Margaret Browne’s letter (July 2) about the heartlessness of Terry Prone’s column on the subject of cancer (June 29).
As a keen observer of Ms Prone’s columns, may I offer these observations to Ms Browne and others who may have been similarly offended?

For a long time I have had the conviction that the clue to reading Terry Prone is first of all to ask yourself what she is spinning this week because if you look carefully behind all the bon mots, bonhomie and funny stories, she is always spinning something.

On this occasion I believe she was advocating the idea that rather than having expectations of cancer care services, “ordinary people” could regard themselves as better human beings if they quietly laid down and died. This is not the first time she has attempted this theme. Not very long ago, also in her column in the Irish Examiner, Terry Prone decried the patients and others who phone Joe Duffy to describe their experiences of the health service – and ridiculed Mr Duffy, his listeners and his programme for enabling such public expressions of despair and concern.

All this, you see, at a time when the Government, and Mary Harney in particular, are coming under fire for the parlous state of the health service into which billions of taxpayers’ euro have been poured to the benefit of private business “investors” – with no concomitant improvement in the quality of service. If anything, things are getting worse.

As a PR professional, Ms Prone has earned a handsome living advising Fianna Fáil governments on how to sell unpopular policies and equally unpopular politicians.

If she has not quite managed the feat of persuading us that these pigs’ ears have been made into silk purses, then she must resort to the other side of public relations: shaping the attitudes of the population at large.

In this last respect, Ms Prone is a tireless and subtle warrior for the neo-conservative, irresponsible and uncaring policies that have destroyed the country. The plight of cancer patients is a powerful phenomenon and one which has regularly brought successive health ministers into disrepute for doing everything and anything bar the needful to improve standards of care.

It is into the heart of this particular scourge of health policy, I believe, that Terry Prone is aiming her spears. We should keep an eye out for them.

Miriam Cotton
Clonakilty
Co Cork

Intellectually lazy and ignorant media are part of the problem

Former leader and founder of the Progressive Democrats, Des O’Malley, was recently interviewed (Saturday, 27th June) by Marian Finucane.

The interview was revealing in that it told us as much about the ignorance of journalists/broadcasters like Marian Finucane as it did about the incompetence of politicians.

The following is analysis and comment as the interview progressed.

On Haughey

Finucane: Do you admire Haughey?

O’Malley: I admire certain aspects of him but fundamentally the man was flawed.

Finucane: But aren’t we all?

O’Malley: It’s an awful pity, he could have been so successful but he chose to carry on in a really silly way.

It’s difficult to believe that these people are talking about the most corrupt politician in the history of the state. They are talking about a man who, for decades, plundered the state of its wealth for the benefit of himself, his family and his friends.

A man who took Irish politics down into the sewer where it remains to this day, a man whose legacy is a country where corruption, incompetence and arrogance are the defining features of the ruling elite.

They are talking about a man who was so bereft of honesty and ethical boundaries that he had no scruples whatsoever in robbing a fund set up to save the life of his best friend.

The But aren’t we all flawed comment by Marian Finucane demonstrates a deep ignorance of the reality and consequences of corruption in Ireland.

Apparently, Finucane sees the corrupt Haughey as just another ordinary citizen who made a couple of mistakes during his lifetime. She appears to be completely ignorant of the massive damage done to Ireland and its people by this criminal.

She also seems to be completely ignorant of how the Haughey corruption virus has spread to every level of Irish society and in particular to the white collar sector.

A caller to the show expressed astonishment at Finucane’s comment saying:

I doubt Marian has failings similar to Haughey. If she did I hope she can expect her P45 waiting for her as she leaves the studio.

Finucane was not pleased with this upbraiding by a mere listener.

Well, I think it’s always very dangerous for anyone to be going around adjusting their halo and saying that they’re holier than thou.

Again, Finucane is demonstrating a dangerous ignorance of the reality of corruption. I say dangerous because, as Haughey was no ordinary citizen, neither is Marian Finucane.

She is one of the most influential broadcasters in the country, every week hundreds of thousands of citizens listen to her words and opinions with close attention.

Most of these listeners take her views/comments as gospel and act/think accordingly. For that reason alone she has an obligation to properly inform herself of the realities of what’s going on in Ireland today.

And Finucane is not the only journalist/broadcaster who seems to live in a parallel world of ignorance. Joe Duffy, Pat Kenny, Charlie Bird and many other RTE current affairs staff are far too close to members of the body politic.

In recent times it has become increasingly evident, to even the most casual observer, that the interaction between most elements of the Irish media and the political/business sectors has become disturbingly unhealthy.

Many of these so called unbiased journalists appear to be personal friends of politicians; they travel together, stay in the same hotels, eat in the same restaurants (often at taxpayer’s expense) and drink in the same bars.

On Mary Harney and the Department of Health

O’Malley praised Harney for having the courage to take on such a difficult job.

This is rubbish; the real story here is not the so called courage of one politician but rather the cowardice of so many others. What would happen, I wonder, if they were asked to lay down their lives for their country – the mind boggles.

O’Malley goes on to wonder what sort of catastrophe would befall the country if Harney decided to give up her job.

I think all sorts of vested interests would ride roughshod over us again.

What is this man talking about? Ok, I accept that O’Malley is getting on a bit but he must still retain enough brain cells to know that the Department of Health/HSE is a vested interest in itself; that its bureaucracy acts at all times in its own interests and certainly not in the interests of patients.

People’s lives are regularly put at risk to cover up gross incompetence and some even die. You can’t get more roughshod than death through incompetence.

On being back in a recession

According to O’Malley we’re back in recession because there wasn’t sufficient supervision and regulation of what went on.

Hang on, wasn’t it his party, the party that promised to clean up Irish politics and make other parties and government officials accountable, in power for most of that time led by none other than his heroine Mary Harney?

On the high moral ground

Finucane: One of the things that got up the nose of Fianna Fail but also of ordinary people was the high moral ground, the holier than thou attitude….It seems to me that the high moral ground can be a lonely enough place to be.

O’Malley: The high moral ground is not just a lonely place it’s also a dangerous place because you can only come down.

Finucane: A silly place, a silly place.

O’Malley: Yes, and that’s why we tried to avoid that, we got painted with that.

My God, we were worn out from trying to stop things happening (corruption). But the more you went at it the more you were accused as being on the high moral ground.

There’s a limit, you have to coexist with people, get on with the job and not let every big or little problem deflect you completely from it.

For years this Irish attitude to the high moral ground has bothered me. It seems that the Irish are the only nation in the world who regard the striving for high moral principles in public life as a bad thing, a silly thing as Finucane says.

This, I believe, is a symptom of our denial of what we really are as a nation. If we all agree that the high moral ground is a bad place, a place where the holier than thou go to adjust their halos then it’s legitimate for everybody to avoid this ground.

This warped attitude to morality in public life also makes it possible to ‘forgive’ any crime. It makes it possible for an apparently intelligent woman like Marian Finucane, and many others in the media, to equate Haughey’s crimes with the minor infringements of morality common in the everyday, it brings us all down to the sewer.

If we’re all living like rats in the sewer of corruption and incompetence then we can all live safely in denial, we can all pretend that Ireland is a normal functioning democracy and any attempt to improve ethical standards, any notion of occupying the high moral ground will receive instant condemnation from the likes of Finucane and O’Malley not because it’s a bad thing but because it threatens their delusional world of ethical ignorance.

For one brief shining moment the PDs were truly revolutionary in their challenge to the swampland of Irish political and business corruption but that corruption is too deep, too all pervading within the Irish system of government to be rooted out easily.

When Mary Harney became leader of the PDs she realised that ethics/accountability was a mugs game and quickly reverted to her Fianna Fail roots and has been living there happily ever since.

On O’Malley’s greatest achievement

The stopping of the Irish aviation bill in 1984 which would have imposed a fine not exceeding £50,000 and/or imprisonment for two years on anybody who sold airline tickets at less than the price which Aer Lingus had fixed in coordination with its cartel partners.

Finucane expressed shock at such extreme law.

Quite extraordinary, it sounds like another country given where we are now.

Given where we are now?

Clearly, Finucane believes that Ireland has moved on, has become a modern accountable democracy and believes that the Ireland of draconian/Tammany Hall type law is dead and gone.

Here’s just a sample of recent laws or proposed laws that Finucane obviously feels are in no way draconian or ‘extraordinary’.

The Employment Equality Act 1998. This act was introduced to bring Ireland into line with EU equal employment rights directives but the main churches were granted an exemption which allows them to hire and fire on the religious beliefs and moral behaviour of employees and potential employees.

There is no difference between this law and the religious laws enforced by the Taliban in Afghanistan.

In February this year the Irish government enacted a law which makes it a criminal offence to sell a Mass card not authorised by a Catholic bishop.

Contained within the Act is a presumption of guilt until proved innocent. This runs contrary to Article 48 (1) of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights.

The Government is in the process of inserting a blasphemy clause into the Defamation Bill which will see citizens liable upon conviction of a fine of up to €25,000.

The proposed Criminal Justice (Amendment) Bill 2009 will, among other measures, do away with the right to trial by jury and provide for secret detention hearings and detention on the unsupported word of a single Garda.

Allow hearsay as admissible evidence and permit information to be given in the absence of a suspect and his or her legal representative.

Ireland is a much more corrupt, much more unequal country today than it has been at any other time in its history.

A major contributing factor to that corruption and inequality is the intellectual laziness and ignorance of broadcasters like Marian Finucane.

Copy to:
Marian Finucane

Law enforcement, mangled bodies and gombeenism

Even though I am a veteran observer of Irish incompetence and stupidity there are still times when I am absolutely astonished by the sheer ignorance of how we conduct our affairs and in particular how we deal with events that involve life and death situations.

Traffic Blues is the name of a new RTE programme that records the new Garda Traffic Corps in action. A number of people called into Liveline on Monday to comment on the most recent edition of this police programme.

The first incident concerned a motorist who was breaking the law by driving with a provisional licence without an accompanying qualified driver. She also had five young children in the back seat who were not wearing seat belts; three of these children were so young that they should have been secured in booster seats.

After some bizarre behaviour by the driver, which included getting down on her knees on the road to beg forgiveness from the garda, viewers were solemnly informed by a programme voiceover that the Garda was about to make a very serious point.

“It’s an on the spot fine, it’s an €80 fine and two penalty points for having children in the back of the car with no seat belts. So off you go there, thank you.”

We then witnessed a so called officer of the law allow this potential death car, with five children clearly at risk; drive off with an illegal driver in charge.

Unfortunately, this extremely dangerous and stupid decision by the Garda is not unusual in a country where law enforcement, at all levels, is a national joke.

The bizarre reaction of Joe Duffy further confirmed that as a nation we are light years away from understanding the basic connection between breaking traffic laws and the regular sight of dead and mangled bodies all over our roads. When a caller suggested that perhaps the errant motorist should not have been allowed to drive away Joe responded:

“But the thing that struck me was that the Gardai are very civil compared to the UK where every English policeman seems to have a tattoo for a start and every English policeman or woman seems to be have a combination of arrogance and ignorance when they’re dealing with the public as they flash their tattooed shoulders or arms. I just think that Gardai come across very well but you think they’re very soft.”

He later repeated this blanket condemnation of an entire police force that, in my opinion, is one of the most courteous and professional in the world.

“My point is the UK police are extraordinarily rough and uncouth with their tattoos and their mace and whatever else they spray on you. Maybe it’s a completely different environment but compared to our Gardai, our Gardai are civil guardians of the peace.”

This is a straight forward case of pathological denial. Joe Duffy is simply incapable of understanding that road traffic laws are there to protect lives, he’s incapable of making the connection between mangled and dead bodies scattered all over the road and the non enforcement of such laws and most of all he’s completely incapable of accepting for a moment the possibility that our police force has more in common with the Keystone Cops than a modern, professional law enforcement agency. Instead, Duffy reverts to the age old gombeenism of attacking the British.

While researching for this post I came across the following definition of denial:

“A mechanism of the immature mind, because it conflicts with the ability to learn from and cope with reality.”

Tragically, this definition applies to the majority of Irish citizens and is one of the principal reasons why our country is a complete failure as a state.

Copy to:
Joe Duffy

Gay Mitchell goes mad

Fine Gael MEP Gay Mitchell went a bit mad on The Last Word today during an interview with Today FMs Anton Savage.

I tuned into the discussion after it started but apparently Mitchell wants a full time radio station to broadcast the ‘debates’ in the Oireachtas.

Mitchell went off the rails when Savage asked him if he could give an example of anything interesting that happened in the Senate during the last month.

Mitchell: No, I’m not going to give you; I’m not answering the question just because you make them up. I can’t think of anything in the last month but I can tell you for example…

Savage: Is that good enough

Mitchell: The issue is that people like you who are meant to be the medium are responsible not people like me I make the laws I’m a very intensive legislator. I work on developing world I work on economic and monetary affairs and when people come along and say ‘we don’t know what you do’ you blame us, you’re to blame, you should be communicating this.

Savage: I’m giving you the forum then, give me something from the Senate that will interest people.

Mitchell: I’m not going to give you any example, listen to me there’s an awful lot of people in this country who are involved in non governmental organisations who would be very happy to hear what is being done about the ten million children a year who are dying in the developing world, who never get to hear about it.

Savage: You said you wanted a radio station, you have a radio station now, I’m giving you open forum

Mitchell: No, you’re not giving me anything, I’m talking to the people I’m not talking to you. People are listening to me and their listening to you and what I’m saying to those people is this, I have an idea and I don’t care if people like you don’t like the idea I have a lot of ideas about a lot of things and I’m entitled to express them.

All I’m asking for is something interesting out of the Senate in the last month.

If you’ll let the people listen to what I’m saying, I’m not going to give you anything for the last month, it’s the third time I’ve told you that, I’m not going to give you anything. I’m going to tell you what the people want an opportunity to listen to…

Savage then played a clip from a debate in the Senate to give listeners an idea of what goes on there.

When the clip was finished Mitchell had hung up.

Seems he wants to burden us with endless political waffle but he couldn’t stand it himself for more than 30 seconds.

Old attitudes die hard

Terry Prone writes about building a new era out to the wreckage of the old, how the present financial disaster could be transformed into an opportunity for Ireland (Irish Examiner).

Unfortunately, Ms. Prone is herself still living in the past as demonstrated by her predictably Irish attitude to obeying the law.

“Just as the mantra, during the boom years, was “You hafta have a laugh” the current mantra is “you hafta survive,” and if that means breaking a few rules set by a bunch of legislators currently held in pretty universal contempt as overpaid, unrealistic and culpable, then those rules are going to be broken.”

Our country is on the brink of disaster because the vast majority of citizens including politicians, regulators and the business sector believed that Ireland, unique among Western countries, could build a stable and progressive democracy while at the same time treating the rule of law as an inconvenience.

Nothing will change until we educate ourselves out of this Tammany Hall mindset.

Time to bear witness once again

Letter in today’s Irish Times.

Madam,

I returned home to Ireland over the weekend and had the unhappy experience of thinking that I had been time-warped back to the 1980s when Charlie Haughey’s stranglehold on the Irish media went almost unchecked (with, of course, notable exceptions).

RTÉ was once again apologising for simply covering a newsworthy story and the Garda Síochána had been dragged in to investigate the hanging of a satirical painting of the Taoiseach. What a fool I was to think that a free and untrammelled media, one of the hallmarks of a consolidated democracy, was now a given in Ireland.

On reading the story of RTÉ’s climb-down and the call from Government press secretary Eoghan Ó Neachtain complaining about news coverage of Conor Casby’s paintings, I shuddered, remembering the atmosphere in the 1980s when similar calls were made to newsrooms including the one I worked in.

I was reminded of my naive incredulity when I was advised by RTÉ management that I should not make a formal complaint to the then taoiseach, Charlie Haughey, who had sent me cascading backwards down the steps of Government Buildings for the temerity of putting a microphone under his nose and asking him what he thought of Stephen Roche’s victory in the Tour de France.

My NUJ colleagues in the RTÉ newsroom had courage and supported my complaint.

They and the rest of us should have our pens and mice at the ready, as it may be time to bear witness once again.

Yours, etc,

Dr JACQUELINE HAYDEN,

Lecturer in Political Science,

Trinity College,

Dublin.

Picturegate: An analysis

Fintan O’Toole does a good analysis of the ongoing picturegate affair in yesterday’s Irish Times.

I agree with his conclusion that the whole affair is nothing less than an abuse of power. If true, he says, “we are back in the day of Sean Doherty and political pressure on the Garda.”

Personally, I don’t believe we ever left those days.

Here’s my analysis/opinion of the reaction of some of the principal characters in the affair.

Brian Cowen: Taoiseach (The Great Leader).

In my opinion it was Mr. Cowen who initiated the police action and demanded the apology from RTE. It’s just not believable that RTE would issue such a craven apology so soon over a report that most normal people would see as a harmless piece of satire.

For RTE to jump so high and so quickly could only be in reaction to the anger of ‘somebody from on high’. I believe the policeman who said he was acting on orders from on high was telling the truth and I believe he got his orders from the Government Press Officer.

Brian Cowen has always viewed those outside the Fianna Fail tribe with suspicion and contempt, including the electorate but in particular the non FF media.

He has clearly taken to heart the fantastic claims made by the FF media regarding his ‘super intelligence and amazing political acumen’. When a political leader begins to believe his own propaganda then satirists and democrats better watch out.

Michael Kennedy: Fianna Fail TD.

Kennedy had no problem if the pictures were shown on any comedy show. He had no problem if they had been published in any newspaper so long as they were in black and white. According to Kennedy, colour has an impact that was unacceptable.

He had no problem if RTE had broadcast the story on any other news programme except the main evening news. According to Kennedy this news should be strictly reserved for serious items.

Mr. Kennedy is one of those Fianna Fail backwoodsmen who believe that RTE should follow guidelines as set out by his party; he believes RTE is a government department.

Mary O’Rourke: Fianna Fail TD.

For this politician freedom of privacy in the loo is supreme, nobody should infringe on that right. So if Cowen had been portrayed fully naked leaving, let’s say, a house of ill repute, O’Rourke would have no problem with that.

O’Rourke joined a discussion on the matter on the Late Late Show on the strict condition that the pictures would not make an appearance in her presence, predictably, RTE agreed.

In common with almost all Fianna Fail politicians O’Rourke possesses a warped sense of morality. For example, she never had any problem with the massive damage done to the people of Ireland by the corrupt Haughey. When Haughey died she referred to his long career of corruption as ‘a few bumps on the road’.

Neither had she any problem with Bertie Ahern’s long series of fairy tales at the tribunal and she obviously sees nothing wrong with a former Taoiseach swearing under oath that he won the money on the horses.

Rónán Mullen: Senator.

Mullen tells us that he would have had no problem with the pictures if they had remained as a private joke with the artist. Like all ultra conservatives Mullen attacked the media for exploiting the situation saying that the stunt wasn’t satire but just a tasteless prank.

He added, bizarrely, that if something is funny it has to be in the eye of the lampooned person??

Senator Mullen is a catholic fundamentalist who was the principal mover behind the law that has made it a criminal offence to sell a Mass card without the permission of a Catholic bishop.

According to Mullen, John waters penned the most accurate and impressive analysis of the affair in the Irish Times.

John Waters: Author/Columnist.

In his intolerant article Waters is extremely insulting to the artist, Conor Casby. He also, predictably, used the affair to attack the media, bloggers and anyone else who he sees as a threat to the State, the Catholic Church or his own sense of public morality.

“The only amusing thing here is Casby’s deluded belief that he has something to say. His response is typical of a public discourse almost fatally degraded by internet auto-eroticism and an obsession with what is called “comedy”. His works are crude, unfunny, and vindictive; without intrinsic content and wholly lacking in artistic merit.”

On those who write on the internet:

“The internet has reduced public debate to the level of a drunken argument, in which no holds are barred, in which deeply unpleasant people get to voice their ignorant opinions in the ugliest terms, in the name of “free speech.”

Fortunately, his views can be dismissed with pity. Until recently I had seen him as an adequate writer with some bizarre views but having just recently read his latest book, Lapsed Agnostic, I sincerely believe the man is in need of some serious guidance.

In the book he sees George Best as a god.

“There was something superhuman in the way he played, something unworldly and yet transcendent in both the worldly and theological senses…He has walked in the skin of a god.”

As I say, a man not to be taken seriously.

Fionn Sheehan: Political editor, Irish Independent. (This reaction threw me a bit).

“The man has a family, the man holds the office of Taoiseach and he’s entitled to have some respect shown towards him in that regard.

In this case, this caricature was in no way commenting on any action that he had undertaken as Taoiseach if it was showing him, you know, running the wrong way on a football pitch or looking behind him and seeing there’s no team behind him or anything like that. But picking on a physical characteristic, I think that’s what would have upset an awful lot of people.

I think the specific reason was the nine o’clock news holds a particular place in Irish society; it’s not the six o’clock news where things are very fast moving and it’s breaking news and people being interviewed to and fro. It’s not News 2 where they take a lighter and more neutral approach. It’s nine o’clock news when the ordinary plain people of Ireland have settled down for the night and the day’s work is done”

Feck, what is this man on, I mean the news is the news is the news. I never realised the Nine O’clock News played such a central role in the life and culture of the Irish people.

Clearly, Mr. Sheehan would agree with Michael Kennedy that RTEs flagship news programmes are a thing apart, on a par with the god ‘George Best’ perhaps.

And what’s this about the ‘ordinary plain people of Ireland settling down after the day’s work is done? Has this man been looking into Dev’s heart lately?

Until now I had always seen Sheehan as a well balanced professional political analyst but, clearly, he’s taken a sharp turn towards the Fianna Fail camp.

Could it have anything to do with the fact his wife is standing as a Fianna Fail candidate in the upcoming local elections? Have we lost yet another potentially great journalist to the moral wilderness that is Fianna Fail?

Noel Whelan: Fianna Fail journalist.

Whelan wrote an article in which he blamed Fine Gael and the media, including RTE, for over reacting. He went on to outline the ‘facts’ of the matter as stated by government officials.

Whelan is one of those journalists who believe everything they’re told by Fianna Fail and attack all those who disagree. He lives a simple but happy life.

Cowen-Gate affair rolls on

There’s a good selection of letters in today’s Irish Times on the Cowen paintings affair. Here’s two, one very funny and the other very accurate.

Madam,

If I find there is an intruder sneaking around my home in the middle of the night, should I dial 999 and tell the operator that someone is attempting to nail a painting to my wall without permission? Because that seems to be a very effective way of getting the gardaí to respond quickly. I certainly won’t tell them that there’s a gang of bankers in the kitchen rummaging through my wallet.

Yours, etc,

SHANE Ó MEARÁIN,
Sandymount Road,
Sandymount,
Dublin 4.

Madam

The unfolding story of Cowen-Gate is an almost perfect parable of the life and abilities of this Government and Fianna Fáil.

With our economy in tatters, our education and health care systems decimated, more people unemployed than ever before, and cronyism and corruption rife in Irish life, it takes two satirical portraits of Brian Cowen in the nip and the ridiculous attempts to censor the coverage of them, for people to finally realise that the emperor has no clothes.

Sad to say, it seems that we are living in a banana republic without either the good weather or the bi-annual excitement of a change of government.

Yours etc,
HARRY LEECH,
Leinster Place,
Rathmines,
Dublin 6.

Niall O'Loughlin: A comfortable but worried artist

The artist Niall O’Loughlin has an interesting take on the Brian Cowen picturegate controversy. He says:

“I personally think what the artist did was a step too far, the painting itself IMO was very poorly executed which I know is irrelevant, however I worry about the long term repercussions of what he did.

Artists are very well treated in this country, lets just hope the government doesn’t form the opinion that we’ve nothing better to do than sit around all day drawing silly pictures of our political leaders and then sneaking into art galleries to hang them up. Enjoy your 15 minutes of fame whoever you are.”

I’ve always assumed that artists were freethinkers, that they pushed boundaries to the limit, acted outside the box, acted and worked with the intention of shocking, enlightening, educating, leading and encouraging the general population to see reality from as many perspectives as possible.

I suspect that Mr. O’Loughlin’s stated fear of possible government reprisals against artists indicates that he’s a comfortable artist, very well established, enjoying considerable monetary favours from the State and is very worried that his less well established and more radical artist colleagues may make things uncomfortable for him.

Copy to:
Niall O’Loughlin

RTEs cowardice seriously damages its credibility

The Brian Cowen caricature stunt which started out as a humourous and harmless stunt has evolved into a very serious matter.The artist, I believe, never dreamed that his/her action would expose RTE as a lapdog of the Government.

Discussing the matter on Today with Pat Kenny, Fianna Fail TD, Michael Kennedy said;

“RTE is there to give serious news items. It’s not a comedy piece…I want it to be balanced, I want it to be unbiased and I want it to be newsworthy, not fickle entertainment.”

I want, I want, I want.

So, we’re clear on what Mr. O’Kennedy and the Government wants, we’re also clear that RTE has no problems or scruples in immediately complying with Government demands.

And keep in mind this is just the latest in a number of cases where RTE were happy to cave in the moment they received a phone call from an angry government.

Last November we saw the outspoken government critic, John Crown, banned from appearing on the Late Late Show and more recently we saw the curtailment of references to Cowen on the Gerry Ryan Show.

But RTE cannot escape the consequences of its actions. I, and I’m sure a great many other people, will never again see its news broadcasts in the same light, particularly if the news report concerns any matter that’s sensitive to Government officials or politicians.

The question will always be in the back of my mind – how much of this report is genuine news and how much is government propaganda?

RTEs craven kowtowing to government bullying has seriously damaged its credibility.

Copy to:
RTE News