Consultant obstedrician Peter Boylan does not believe there should be a public inquiry in the Savita Halapanavar case. He give two reasons:
Mr. Halapanavar is grieving for his wife and expected child, so he’s in a state of grief at the moment and that needs to be taken into account when assessing his response.
I dont think Mr. Halapanavar would agree with this patronising view.
If it’s a public inquiry it will descend into a bit of a circus because there will be misinterpretations of the evidence given which will be bandied about in the media.
Secrecy is always the knee-jerk response to scandal in Ireland.
In functional democracies like the United Kingdom public inquiries are the norm.
This is becasue functional democracies have checks and balances built into their systems. They have in place authorities that have the power to act independently of political power.
The Leveson Inquiry has just produced an excellent report within a few months and cost a mere £7 million.
British citizens from practically every level of society from ordinary joe soaps, to journalists, to movie stars right up to the Prime Minister himself were questioned in public, under oath.
The sky did not fall in and British citizens are likely to see some swift and real reform as a result.
In Ireland, there is no law enforcement authority with the power to act independently of the corrupt political system.
This fact lies at the core of every scandal in Ireland.
It’s the principal reason why people of power and influence are never held to account.